Comparative Analysis of H&E and Prussian Blue Staining in a Mouse Model of Cerebral Microbleeds

56Citations
Citations of this article
87Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cerebral microbleeds are microscopic hemorrhages with deposits of blood products in the brain, which can be visualized with MRI and are implicated in cerebrovascular diseases. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Perl’s Prussian blue are popular staining methods used to localize cerebral microbleeds in pathology. This paper compared these two staining techniques in a mouse model of cerebral microbleeds. We used lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to induce cerebral microhemorrhages. C57B6 mice were treated with LPS (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle at baseline and at 24 hr. The brains were extracted 48 hr after the first injection and adjacent coronal sections were stained with H&E and Prussian blue to compare the effectiveness of the two staining techniques. H&E-positive stains were increased with LPS treatment and were correlated with grossly visible microhemorrhages on the brain surface; Prussian blue-positive stains, by comparison, showed no significant increase with LPS treatment and did not correlate with either H&E-positive stains or surface microhemorrhages. H&E staining is thus a more reliable indicator of acute bleeding events induced by LPS in this model within a short time span.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, S., Grigoryan, M. M., Vasilevko, V., Sumbria, R. K., Paganini-Hill, A., Cribbs, D. H., & Fisher, M. J. (2014). Comparative Analysis of H&E and Prussian Blue Staining in a Mouse Model of Cerebral Microbleeds. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 62(11), 767–773. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155414546692

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free