Co-creating Through Win and Quick: the Role of Type of Contest and Constraints on Creativity

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Previous literature has highlighted that open innovation contests are important innovation tools for companies that wish to involve users in the product development process to generate creative ideas. Contests can have different characteristics, but it is not clear which formats allow companies to obtain the most creative suggestions from their customers. In this article, we hypothesize that evaluative (vs. luck-based) open innovation contests lead to the generation of more creative products, but only in presence of time constraints. In addition, we hypothesize that design variety mediates this effect. The results of an experimental study, based on a customization toolkit, provide support for our theoretical framework. Our research contributes to the literature on open innovation contests by identifying the ideal conditions to stimulate consumer creativity and offers a series of managerial implications on contest design.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardamone, E., Marozzo, V., Miceli, G. “Nino,” & Raimondo, M. A. (2023). Co-creating Through Win and Quick: the Role of Type of Contest and Constraints on Creativity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(4), 4449–4465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01070-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free