Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Impact on outcomes

42Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

AIM to evaluate whether the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)-surgery interval time significantly impacts the pathological complete response (pCR) rate and longterm survival. METHODS One hundred and seventy-six patients with gastric cancer undergoing NACT and a planned gastrectomy at the Chinese PLA General Hospital were selected from January 2011 to January 2017. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to investigate the impact of NACT-surgery interval time (< 4 wk, 4-6 wk, and > 6 wk) on pCR rate and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The NACT-surgery interval time and clinician T stage were independent predictors of pCR. The interval time > 6 wk was associated with a 74% higher odds of pCR as compared with an interval time of 4-6 wk (p = 0.044), while the odds ratio (OR) of clinical T3 vs clinical T4 stage for pCR was 2.90 (95%CI: 1.04-8.01, p = 0.041). In Cox regression analysis of long-term survival, postneoadjuvant therapy pathological N (ypN) stage significantly impacted OS (N0 vs N3: HR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.37-0.70, p = 0.015; N1 vs N3: HR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.02-0.81, p = 0.029) and disease-free survival (DFS) (N0 vs N3: HR = 0.11, 95%CI: 0.24-0.52, p = 0.005; N1 vs N3: HR = 0.17, 95%CI: 0.02-0.71, p = 0.020). The surgical procedure also had a positive impact on OS and DFS. The hazard ratio of distal gastrectomy vs total gastrectomy was 0.12 (95%CI: 0.33-0.42, p = 0.001) for OS, and 0.13 (95%CI: 0.36-0.44, p = 0.001) for DFS. CONCLUSION The NACT-surgery interval time is associated with pCR but has no impact on survival, and an interval time > 6 wk has a relatively high odds of pCR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Y., Zhang, K. C., Huang, X. H., Xi, H. Q., Gao, Y. H., Liang, W. Q., … Chen, L. (2018). Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Impact on outcomes. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 24(2), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i2.257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free