Sex differences in outcomes after infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair among Medicare beneficiaries

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Despite improving abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) outcomes in the United States, significant disparities exist. Smaller studies found that women experienced worse outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), yet few larger analyses have confirmed this. This study aimed to characterize sex-related differences in outcomes among patients who underwent infrarenal EVAR. Methods: Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries ⩾ 66 years old who underwent infrarenal EVAR for intact AAA between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was a composite of late aneurysm rupture, aortic reintervention, conversion to open repair, or all-cause mortality. Cox regression and Fine–Gray models were used. Results: Among 111,381 patients, the mean age was 76.63 ± 6.60 years, 92.88% were White, and 21.19% were women. The maximum follow-up was 3283 days. The hazard of the primary outcome was higher in women in the adjusted model (p = 0.013). When mortality was excluded, the association with sex persisted (p < 0.0010 [adjusted subdistribution model]; p < 0.0010 [adjusted cause-specific model]). Women experienced a lower frequency of postprocedural office visits, but a higher frequency of emergency department visits and hospital readmissions. Conclusion: Women undergoing EVAR had a greater risk of adverse outcomes and unexpected healthcare utilization. Further investigation is warranted to determine the drivers of these outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raja, A., Krawisz, A., Song, Y., Li, S., Yeh, R. W., Dua, A., & Secemsky, E. A. (2026). Sex differences in outcomes after infrarenal endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair among Medicare beneficiaries. Vascular Medicine (United Kingdom), 31(2), 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X251415154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free