Severe theophylline poisoning: Charcoal haemoperfusion or haemodialysis?

20Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Theophylline poisoning with a blood level of 183 mg/l in a 38-year-old man was treated with activated charcoal by mouth, but despite this the blood level of theophylline rose and there was circulatory collapse with rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure and hyperthermia. Treatment with charcoal haemoperfusion and simultaneous haemodialysis was given, followed by continuous arteriovenous haemodialysis (CAVHD). Mean extraction rates of theophylline were 26% during CAVHD, and 86% during combined dialysis and charcoal haemoperfusion. During combined treatment, the mean extraction rate of haemodialysis was 62%, compared with 48% for charcoal haemoperfusion. In summary, activated charcoal given by mouth may be unable to prevent a rise in blood levels and the development of complications after substantial theophylline overdose. If theophylline is to be removed from the blood, a combination of charcoal haemoperfusion and haemodialysis will give the best clearance, but haemodialysis alone may be effective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Higgins, R. M., Hearing, S., Goldsmith, D. J. A., Keevil, B., Venning, M. C., & Ackrill, P. (1995). Severe theophylline poisoning: Charcoal haemoperfusion or haemodialysis? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 71(834), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.71.834.224

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free