Comparison between endoscopic brush cytology performed before and after biliary stricture dilation for cancer detection

31Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background - Confirmation of malignancy within biliary strictures is endoscopically challenging. Dilation of strictures has been reported to enhance cytological diagnosis. Aim - To compare brush cytology results before and after biliary stricture dilation. Patients and Methods - Patients with extra-hepatic biliary stricture at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were included in the study. Brushing was performed before and immediately after dilation using a 10 Fr dilating catheter. Cytology samples were classified as: negative for malignancy, presence of atypical cells, insufficient material, suspicious for malignancy or positive for malignancy. Final diagnosis was established by surgery, biopsy or follow-up. Results - Biliary brush cytology was performed in 50 patients, with an overall sensitivity of 40% and 27.5%, before and after dilation, respectively. The combination of results increased cancer detection rate to 45%. There were 5/50 (10%) minor complications and one death related to the procedure. Conclusions - Brush cytology performed before biliary stricture dilation has a similar cancer detection rate to that following dilation, although the combination of results enhances sensitivity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ornellas, L. C., Santos, G. D. C., Nakao, F. S., & Ferrari, A. P. (2006). Comparison between endoscopic brush cytology performed before and after biliary stricture dilation for cancer detection. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 43(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032006000100007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free