Robotics Coupled with Navigation for Pediatric Spine Surgery: Initial Intraoperative Experience with 162 Cases

5Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: This study assesses intraoperative efficacy, accuracy, and complications of pedicle screw placement using robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) in pediatric spine surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent spine deformity surgery using RAN at a single pediatric institution from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. Patient demographics, perioperative metrics, screw execution and accuracy, technical difficulties, and other outcomes were summarized. In cases with postoperative computed tomography scans, screws were classified using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification scale. Fisher exact tests were used to assess the relationship between procedural changes and lateral screw malposition. Results: One hundred sixty-two cases with an average patient age of 15.1 years (range, 4 to 31 y) were reviewed. The most common diagnosis was adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (n=80) with an average major curve of 65 degrees. Of 1467 screws attempted, 1461 were executed successfully (99.6%). All failures were in Type D pedicles and were lateral deviations recognized with routine intraoperative fluoroscopy. In cases with postoperative computed tomography imaging, 100% of screws (n=197) were placed with complete containment (Grade A). Remaining screws were graded as accurate by mirroring fluoroscopy and planned computer software positions. In 4% of cases, loss of registration was detected by a safety check before drilling at the planned level. There were no neurological deficits or returns to the operating room. Two changes occurred as part of the learning curve associated with this technique. (1) Adoption of a high-speed navigated drill: Change 1 (last 74 cases). (2) Drilling all pilot holes robotically first, then placing screws within the robotically established tracts to avoid motion and subsequent registration disruption: Change 2 (last 39 cases). Change 1 was less likely to result in screw malposition as no screws skived lateral with the technique (P=0.03). Change 2 trended toward statistical significance for avoidance of screw malposition and loss of registration, as no loss of registration occurred after adopting this technique. Conclusion: This study highlights the safety and screw accuracy associated with the use of RAN in pediatric patients. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Welch, N., Mota, F., Birch, C., Hutchinson, L., & Hedequist, D. (2023). Robotics Coupled with Navigation for Pediatric Spine Surgery: Initial Intraoperative Experience with 162 Cases. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 43(5), E337–E342. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free