Comparing Law: COMPARATIVE LAW AS RECONSTRUCTION OF COLLECTIVE COMMITMENTS

31Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The enterprise of comparative law is familiar, yet its conceptual whereabouts remain somewhat obscure. Comparing Law: Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments reconstructs comparative law scholarship into a systematic account of comparative law as an autonomous academic discipline. The point of that discipline is neither to harmonize world law, nor to emphasize its cultural diversity, but rather to understand each legal system on its own terms. As the proposed reconstruction exercise involves bridging comparative law and contemporary legal theory, it shows how comparative law and legal theory both stand to benefit from being exposed to each other. At a time when many courses are adding a transnational perspective, Valcke offers a more theoretical, broadened, and refreshed view of comparative law.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valcke, C. (2018). Comparing Law: COMPARATIVE LAW AS RECONSTRUCTION OF COLLECTIVE COMMITMENTS. Comparing Law: Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments (pp. 1–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555852

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free