A comparison of skilled nursing facility rehabilitation treatment and outcomes under medicare managed care and medicare fee-for-service reimbursement

19Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This article compares the rehabilitation treatment and outcomes of Medicare managed care organization (MCO) and fee-for-service (FFS) patients in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Design and Methods: Data on 514 MCO patients and 420 FFS patients treated in four for-profit Southern California-based SNFs between June 1996 and September 1998 were analyzed with bivariate and multivariate regression models. Results: After controlling for time since onset and other sociodemographic and health status characteristics, Medicare MCO patients were found to receive significantly fewer therapy units and have significantly shorter lengths of stay in rehabilitation programs. Implications: The findings may be the result of more global differences in the trajectories of care among MCO and FFS patients treated in SNFs, yet they highlight critical issues related to the spread of Medicare managed care in nursing homes and the dynamic between MCO and FFS reimbursement systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Angelelli, J. J., Wilber, K. H., & Myrtle, R. (2000). A comparison of skilled nursing facility rehabilitation treatment and outcomes under medicare managed care and medicare fee-for-service reimbursement. Gerontologist, 40(6), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/40.6.646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free