The effects of remifentanil and thoracic epidural on oxygenation and pulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation

31Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of remifentanil and thoracic epidural analgesia on the hemodynamic changes and pulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracotomy. Design: Prospective, single crossover design. Setting: Tertiary care hospital. Participants: Thirty-four patients undergoing OLV for thoracic surgery. Interventions: During general anesthesia with 2-lung ventilation, one-lung ventilation with remifentanil infusion, and one-lung ventilation with thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), hemodynamic parameters and arterial and mixed venous blood gases were taken from the radial and pulmonary artery catheters. During these 3 study periods, cardiac index (CI) was measured using thermodilution technique while shunt fraction (Qs/Qt), alveolar arterial oxygen gradient (A-a O2), and systemic (SVRI) and pulmonary vascular resistances indices (PVRI) were calculated. A p value <0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Measurements and Main Results: When OLV was instituted, there was a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure. Arterial oxygenation decreased, whereas CI and Qs/Qt increased during OLV, but there was no significant difference between remifentanil infusion and thoracic epidural analgesia. Conclusions: Both remifentanil infusion and TEA are suitable for analgesia during thoracic surgery when OLV is used. There was no significant difference in PaO2 and Qs/Qt during each administration. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chow, M. Y. H., Goh, M. H., Boey, S. K., Thirugnanam, A., & Ip-Yam, P. C. (2003). The effects of remifentanil and thoracic epidural on oxygenation and pulmonary shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 17(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1053/jcan.2003.12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free