How Did Evil Come into the World? A Primordial Free-Will Theodicy

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

James P. Sterba has provided a compelling argument to the effect that given the extent of significant, and indeed even horrendous, evil that an all-good and all-powerful being could have prevented, there is no God. There is a hidden assumption in Sterba’s reasoning, involving an inference from God being able to do anything metaphysically possible (omnipotence) to his being, after creation, able to prevent evil. As what follows shows, that isn’t a purely logical matter. It depends on ruling out a determinate theological account of how creation limits what is then metaphysically possible for God, an account set out in detail below. So Sterba’s argument is not deductively valid, unless that account is incoherent. Accordingly, we are back in the realm of total judgments of theoretical plausibility, and the effects of God-given grace on what then will strike one as the right view to live by.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnston, M. (2023). How Did Evil Come into the World? A Primordial Free-Will Theodicy. Religions, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14030402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free