Bayesian Experimental Design Without Posterior Calculations: An Adversarial Approach

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Most computational approaches to Bayesian experimental design require making posterior calculations repeatedly for a large number of potential designs and/or simulated datasets. This can be expensive and prohibit scaling up these methods to models with many parameters, or designs with many unknowns to select. We introduce an efficient alternative approach without posterior calculations, based on optimising the expected trace of the Fisher information, as discussed by Walker (2016). We illustrate drawbacks of this approach, including lack of invariance to reparameterisation and encouraging designs in which one parameter combination is inferred accurately but not any others. We show these can be avoided by using an adversarial approach: the experimenter must select their design while a critic attempts to select the least favourable parameterisation. We present theoretical properties of this approach and show it can be used with gradient based optimisation methods to find designs efficiently in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prangle, D., Harbisher, S., & Gillespie, C. S. (2023). Bayesian Experimental Design Without Posterior Calculations: An Adversarial Approach. Bayesian Analysis, 18(1), 133–163. https://doi.org/10.1214/22-BA1306

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free