Applicability of the contingent valuation method to cost-benefit analysis for rural parks

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rural parks are public projects that need to be evaluated by cost-benefit analysis, but this is difficult due to the lack of market value. This paper evaluates the applicability of the contingent valuation method (CVM) by analyzing the relation between benefits of the park and visitation range. Evaluation models for willingness-to-pay (WTP) were modified with consideration of visitation behaviour of residents estimated by the gravity model. The results indicate that: (1) benefits evaluated by the WTP value decrease with distance, not because of a decreasing tendency in the WTP value itself, but because of a decline in visitation frequency influenced by distance; and (2) benefits of all residents increased because of a rise in the number of non-visitors when the researchers set the survey range wider, however, benefits evaluated by visitors' WTP converged to a constant level at a certain range. Therefore, the critical factor for applying the CVM to a cost-benefit analysis with stability is to exclude, or to control, the WTP value of non-visitors, especially non-visitors outside of the feasible visitation range. © 2007 WIT Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kunimitsu, Y. (2007). Applicability of the contingent valuation method to cost-benefit analysis for rural parks. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 102, 727–736. https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP070702

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free