Immersion Versus Interaction Cost: The Player Experience With Game HUD Information on a Smartphone Screen

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While common Heads-Up Display (HUD) design strategies seek to enhance immersion by minimizing or dynamically hiding on-screen elements, this study investigates a distinct alternative: the complete relocation of the HUD information to a smartphone. The goal is to test the trade-off of achieving a fully unobstructed primary view—a benefit that on-screen minimization cannot fully provide—against the inherent cognitive costs of multi-display interaction. We conducted online experiments using first-person shooter and racing game prototypes, assessing player experience via questionnaires, performance metrics, and qualitative feedback. Quantitative results revealed no significant overall improvement in immersion or performance. In fact, a statistically significant decrease in Cognitive Involvement (p = 0.03) was observed in the racing game. Qualitatively, while participants noted the high interaction cost, they also expressed interest in the concept for slower-paced genres. Our findings demonstrate that the benefits of a completely clean screen are largely offset by the costs of divided attention, indicating that this strategy is not a universal immersion enhancer. Future research should therefore focus on genre-specific applications and the development of interactive features to mitigate these attentional demands.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bellino, A., & Vilches, D. (2025). Immersion Versus Interaction Cost: The Player Experience With Game HUD Information on a Smartphone Screen. IEEE Access, 13, 175746–175759. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3619849

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free