Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation?

  • Barraud J
  • Cautela J
  • Orabona M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is effective to prevent sudden cardiac death (SCD) in selected patients with heart disease known to be at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Nevertheless, this invasive and definitive therapy is not indicated in patients with potentially transient or reversible causes of sudden death, or in patients with temporary contra-indication for ICD placement. The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is increasingly used for SCD prevention both in patients awaiting ICD implantation or with an estimated high risk of ventricular arrhythmia though to be transient. We conducted a review of current clinical uses and benefits of the WCD, and described its technical aspects, limitations and perspectives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barraud, J., Cautela, J., Orabona, M., Pinto, J., Missenard, O., Laine, M., … Peyrol, M. (2017). Wearable cardioverter defibrillator: Bridge or alternative to implantation? World Journal of Cardiology, 9(6), 531. https://doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.531

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free