Abstract
The recent report of the epidemiologic study in Woburn, Massachusetts has focussed renewed attention upon the methods used by epidemiologists and other public health professionals in evaluating the health impact of environmental exposures. Much attention has been given to the statistical methods by which the data gathered in epidemiologic studies, both observational and demographic, should be analyzed. Epidemiologic methods have not been accorded as much attention, although the develop-ment and validation of such techniques is vital to the progress of environ-mental epidemiology. An annual meeting at which recent epidemiologic and statistical methodologie advances would be discussed could greatly help the epidemiologic community in quickly assimilating such knowledge. Less emphasis has also been given to the means by which those data are collected during the study. Several approaches to dealing with the problems faced by environmental epidemiologists in collecting data are discussed, such as the development of national population-based disease registries. The use of such national data sets, such as the NHANES and NHDS data bases, are also noted. An audit of the national vital statistics system is suggested, insofar as it can serve as an indicator of sentinel health events. Similar assessments of other national statistics systems, such as those maintained by the Centers for Disease Control, are also needed. © 1988, Institute of Mathematical Statistics. All Rights Reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Lilienfèld, D. E. (1988). Changing research methods in environmental epidemiology. Statistical Science, 3(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012827
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.