Prospective cohort study of persistent hypertension following pre-eclampsia at Medani Hospital, Sudan

9Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the incidence of, and factors associated with, persistent hypertension in patients with pre-eclampsia. Methods A prospective cohort study enrolled patients presenting with pre-eclampsia at Wad Medani Maternity Hospital, Sudan, between March 1 and October 31, 2014. Obstetric, clinical, and biochemical variables were recorded at presentation and at 6 weeks after delivery. Results Of 188 patients enrolled in the study, 6-week follow-up data were available for 165. Among these patients, 136 (82.4%) and 29 (17.6) had mild and severe pre-eclampsia, respectively. At 6-week follow-up, 58 (35.2%) patients were experiencing persistent hypertension. Patients with persistent hypertension demonstrated significantly lower platelet counts at baseline (P = 0.001) and neonatal weight at delivery (P < 0.001) than patients who were normotensive at 6 weeks. Severe pre-eclampsia was more common among patients who experienced persistent hypertension than those who were normotensive 6 weeks after delivery (P < 0.001). In a logistic-regression analysis, none of the investigated factors was associated with persistent hypertension; however, patients experiencing severe pre-eclampsia were 7.3-times more likely to experience persistent hypertension than patients with mild pre-eclampsia (95% confidence interval 1.6-32.2; P = 0.008). Conclusion Persistent hypertension 6 weeks after delivery was common among patients who experienced pre-eclampsia in Sudan (particularly severe pre-eclampsia) regardless of patients' age and parity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fadalallah, Z. M., Elhassan, E. M., Rayis, D. A., Abdullahi, H., & Adam, I. (2016). Prospective cohort study of persistent hypertension following pre-eclampsia at Medani Hospital, Sudan. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 134(1), 66–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free