Impact of residence altitude on readmission in patients with heart failure

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective Mountain districts normally have tougher geographic conditions than plain districts, which might worsen heart failure (HF) conditions in patients. Also, those places frequently are associated with social problems of ageing, underpopulation and fewer medical services, which might cause delay in detection of disease progression and require more admissions. We investigated the association of residence altitude with readmission in patients with HF. Methods We followed 452 patients with HF to determine all-cause readmissions over a median of 1.1 years. The altitude of patient residences, population, proportion of the elderly and number of hospitals or clinics in a minor administrative district (Cho-Aza district) located at the residences were examined using data from the 2010 census and Google Maps. Results All-cause readmissions were observed in 269 (60%) patients. The altitude of ≥200m was significantly associated with readmissions (HR, 1.49; 95 % CI 1.12 to 1.96; p=0.006) after adjustment for physical and haemodynamic parameters, left ventricular ejection fraction, brain natriuretic peptide and components of the established score for predicting readmission for HF. Altitude was significantly associated with ageing, underpopulation, fewer hospitals or clinics and lower temperature (all p<0.01), with an increased tendency for readmission during the winter season; however, it was not associated with patient clinical parameters. Conclusions High altitude residence may be an important predictor for readmission in patients with HF. This relationship may be confounded by unfavourable sociogeographic conditions at higher altitudes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saito, M., Yamaoka, M., Ohzawa, M., Tominaga, E., Takahashi, K., Morofuji, T., … Inaba, S. (2018). Impact of residence altitude on readmission in patients with heart failure. Open Heart, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2018-000865

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free