Outcomes of a multifaceted physical activity regimen as part of a diabetes self-management intervention

34Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is important for management of diabetes, yet practical interventions that achieve sustained behavior change are rare. Purpose: The goals of this research were to evaluate the effectiveness of a multifaceted PA intervention for people with type 2 diabetes that emphasized participant choice in activity selection. Baseline activity patterns were examined to determine whether they predicted changes in PA at 2 months. Methods: Three hundred thirty-five participants were recruited from 42 primary care physicians and then randomized to either a computer-assisted, tailored self-management intervention (N = 174) or health risk appraisal with feedback control (N = 161). Primary outcome measures included the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors Questionnaire, diet, and psychosocial assessments at baseline and 2 months. Results: For 301 participants who completed the 2-month follow-up, the intervention significantly improved all PA (p < .01) and moderate PA (metabolic equivalents > 3.0, p < .01) relative to controls. Baseline cluster analyses grouped participant activity patterns into three categories. At 2 months, cluster assignment differentially predicted change in calories expended in moderate, rote, sport, and lifestyle PA. Conclusions: A computer-assisted, multifaceted approach to PA demonstrated improvement after 2 months. The results suggest that individuals are capable of adjusting their activity patterns to maximize their PA. © 2006 by The Society of Behavioral Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, D. K., Estabrooks, P. A., Strycker, L. A., Toobert, D. J., Bull, S. S., & Glasgow, R. E. (2006). Outcomes of a multifaceted physical activity regimen as part of a diabetes self-management intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(2), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm3102_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free