A guide to open science practices for animal research

20Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ATrUan:sPlaletaiosneacol nbfiiormmtehdaitcaalllhreeasdeiangrclehvreelsliaerseroenpraenseimntaeldecoxrpreercitmlye:nts and provides the underlying proof of practice for clinical trials, which places an increased duty of care on translational researchers to derive the maximum possible output from every experiment performed. The implementation of open science practices has the potential to initiate a change in research culture that could improve the transparency and quality of translational research in general, as well as increasing the audience and scientific reach of published research. However, open science has become a buzzword in the scientific community that can often miss mark when it comes to practical implementation. In this Essay, we provide a guide to open science practices that can be applied throughout the research process, from study design, through data collection and analysis, to publication and dissemination, to help scientists improve the transparency and quality of their work. As open science practices continue to evolve, we also provide an online toolbox of resources that we will update continually.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diederich, K., Schmitt, K., Schwedhelm, P., Bert, B., & Heinl, C. (2022). A guide to open science practices for animal research. PLoS Biology, 20(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001810

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free