Phosphorylated c-Src in the nucleus is associated with improved patient outcome in ER-positive breast cancer

41Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Elevated c-Src protein expression has been shown in breast cancer and in vitro evidence suggests a role in endocrine resistance. To investigate whether c-Src is involved in endocrine resistance, we examined the expression of both total and activated c-Src in human breast cancer specimens from a cohort of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. Tissue microarray technology was employed to analyse 262 tumour specimens taken before tamoxifen treatment. Immunohistochemistry using total c-Src and activated c-Src antibodies was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and log-rank test were performed. High level of nuclear activated Src was significantly associated with improved overall survival (P=0.047) and lower recurrence rates on tamoxifen (P=0.02). Improved patient outcome was only seen with activated Src in the nucleus. Nuclear activated Src expression was significantly associated with node-negative disease and a lower NPI (P<0.05). On subgroup analysis, only ER-positive/progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive tumours were associated with improved survival (P=0.004). This shows that c-Src activity is increased in breast cancer and that activated Src within the nucleus of ER-positive tumours predicts an improved outcome. In ER/PgR-positive disease, activated Src kinase does not appear to be involved in de novo endocrine resistance. Further study is required in ER-negative breast cancer as this may represent a cohort in which it is associated with poor outcome. © 2008 Cancer Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campbell, E. J., McDuff, E., Tatarov, O., Tovey, S., Brunton, V., Cooke, T. G., & Edwards, J. (2008). Phosphorylated c-Src in the nucleus is associated with improved patient outcome in ER-positive breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 99(11), 1769–1774. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free