Comparison of lymph node metastases assessment with the use of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T versus 3.0 T in a rabbit model

13Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To prospectively compare the diagnostic performances of 1.5 T and 3.0 T ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in a rabbit model. Materials and Methods: Experiments were approved by the animal care committee. VX2 carcinomas were implanted into the thighs of 18 rabbits 3 or 4 weeks before MRI examinations. T2*-weighted 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI was performed 24 hours after USPIO (2.6 mg/kg iron) administration. Two radiologists calculated signal intensity (SI) ratios (ie, the ratios of postcontrast to precontrast signal intensity) of each LN and also evaluated for the presence of a metastasis in the iliac and retroperitoneal LNs at 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI. Student's t-test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and a Z test were used for the statistical analysis. Results: Metastases were confirmed in 45 of 80 LNs by histopathology. For benign LNs the mean SI ratio at 1.5 T was higher (0.538) than at 3.0 T (0.463) (P = 0.004). In qualitative analysis, 1.5 T and 3.0 T USPIO-enhanced MRI showed similar Az values (0.951 vs. 0.939; P = 0.296). The specificity of 3.0 T USPIO-enhanced MRI was higher (91.4% [32 of 35]) than that of 1.5 T imaging (82.9% [29 of 35]) (P = 0.013); however, the sensitivities (88.9% [40 of 45]) were the same in the both modalities. Conclusion: 3.0 T USPIO-enhanced MRI shows a higher specificity as compared to 1.5 T imaging without a significant difference of sensitivity in a rabbit VX2 model. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Choi, S. H., Kim, K. H., Moon, W. K., Kim, H. C., Cha, J. H., Paik, J. H., & Chang, K. H. (2010). Comparison of lymph node metastases assessment with the use of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T versus 3.0 T in a rabbit model. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 31(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free