Electromyographic activity during active prone hip extension did not discriminate individuals with and without low back pain

  • Guimarães C
  • Sakamoto A
  • Laurentino G
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Changes in activation of the trunk and hip extensor muscles can result in excessive stress on the lumbar spinal structures, predisposing them to lesions and pain. OBJECTIVES To compare electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus, semitendinosus and the erector spinae muscles between asymptomatic and individuals with low back pain during active prone hip extension exercises. METHODS Fifty individuals were recruited and divided into two groups: 30 asymptomatic (24.5 ± 3.47 years) and 20 with mechanical low back pain (28.75 ± 5.52 years). They performed active prone hip extension exercises, while the activation parameters (latency, duration and quantity of activation) of the investigated muscles were recorded by electromyography. The beginnings of the movements were detected by a motion capture system. Differences between the groups were investigated employing Student t-tests or Mann-Whitney-U tests, according to the data distribution. RESULTS No significant differences were found between the groups for any of the investigated muscles. Muscular activation patterns were similar for both groups, starting with the semitendinosus, followed by the erector spinae, and then, by the gluteus maximus. For both groups, significant delays in the onset of the gluteus maximus were observed. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of the electromyographic activity was not capable of discriminating individuals with and without low back pain, suggesting an overlap in the studied populations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guimarães, C. Q., Sakamoto, A. C. L., Laurentino, G. E. C., & Teixeira-Salmela, L. F. (2010). Electromyographic activity during active prone hip extension did not discriminate individuals with and without low back pain. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 14(4), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1413-35552010005000017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free