Geographical information systems-based marketing decisions: Effects of alternative visualizations on decision quality

35Citations
Citations of this article
164Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Marketing planners often use geographical information systems (GISs) to help identify suitable retail locations, regionally distribute advertising campaigns, and target direct marketing activities. Geographical information systems thematic maps facilitate the visual assessment of map regions. A broad set of alternative symbolizations, such as circles, bars, or shading, can be used to visually represent quantitative geospatial data on such maps. However, there is little knowledge on which kind of symbolization is the most adequate in which problem situation. In a large-scale experimental study, the authors show that the type of symbolization strongly influences decision performance. The findings indicate that graduated circles are appropriate symbolizations for geographical information systems thematic maps, and their successful utilization seems to be virtually Independent of personal characteristics, such as spatial ability and map experience. This makes circle symbolizations particularly suitable for effective decision making and cross-functional communication. © 2010, American Marketing Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ozimec, A. M., Natter, M., & Reutterer, T. (2010). Geographical information systems-based marketing decisions: Effects of alternative visualizations on decision quality. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.94

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free