Experiences with fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infections via upper gastrointestinal tract

11Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dramatic changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections have been reported from the western world in the past decade. The proportion of severe cases is significantly elevating and clinicians now have to contend with the problem of additional and more frequent episodes of recurrences including an upward trend in the mortality rate. This situation led us to investigate the possibility of the fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). An amount of 100 ml of fecal microbiota solution was instilled into a nasojejunal (NJ) tube in 16 cases and into a nasogastric (NG) tube in 44 cases. In all of the cases, where the solution was instilled via nasojejunal tubes, the symptoms resolved within 24 h. We did not note any recurrences in this group. When the material was flushed in through nasogastric tubes, the symptoms resolved in 39 (88.64%) cases within 24 h. In this group, we have experienced a recurrent episode of C. difficile infection in five (11.36%) cases. Three of them were cured with a second transplantation. We have found that in our practice the upper gastrointestinal tract methods had the primary cure rate of 91.67%, whereas the secondary cure rate is 96.67%. When we compared the NJ and NG methods, we have found that the differences in the outcomes are not significant statistically (p = 0.3113 using Fisher’s exact probability test). In conclusion, FMT proved to be very effective, particularly in recurrent infections and in cases where conventional treatment had failed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vigvári, S., Vincze, Á., Solt, J., Sipos, D., Feiszt, Z., Kovács, B., … Péterfi, Z. (2018). Experiences with fecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infections via upper gastrointestinal tract. Acta Microbiologica et Immunologica Hungarica, 66(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.65.2018.051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free