Psychological flexibility in mild traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of measures

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Primary objective: In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of measures of psychological flexibility in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample. Method and Procedures: Adults who sustained a mTBI (n = 112) completed the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–Acquired Brain Injury reactive avoidance subscale (AAQ-ABI (RA). Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were conducted to evaluate the facture structure, dimensionality, and differential item functioning. Construct validity was determined by correlating the AAQ-ABI (RA) with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Revised (AAQ-II) and Fear Avoidance after Traumatic Brain Injury (FAB-TBI). Main outcome and Results: The AAQ-ABI (RA) was found to have strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.87). Consistent with previous findings, the AAQ-ABI (RA) had one distinct factor. Fit to the unidimensional Rasch model was adequate ((Formula presented.) 2 (18) = 22.5, p =.21) with no evidence of differential item functioning across person factors examined. The AAQ-ABI (RA) also had expected relationships with theoretically relevant constructs. Conclusions: The AAQ-ABI (RA) appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of psychological flexibility in mTBI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faulkner, J. W., Snell, D. L., Theadom, A., Mahon, S., Barker-Collo, S., & Skirrow, P. (2021). Psychological flexibility in mild traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of measures. Brain Injury, 35(9), 1103–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2021.1959062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free