Comparison of the point-collocation non-intrusive polynomial (NIPC) and non-intrusive spectral projection (NISP) methods for the γ- r θ transition model

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the present work, a comparative study of two major non-intrusive polynomial chaos methods, Point-Collocation Non-Intrusive Polynomial Chaos (NIPC) and Non-Intrusive Spectral Projection (NISP), was conducted for the transitional γ- R θ transitional model. Three multiple model coefficients, C a2 , C e1 , and C e2 were considered with multiple random inputs with the assumption of uniform distributions with ±10% deviation. The target transitional flows were one around a flat plate and Aerospatiale A-airfoil. Deterministic solutions were obtained by employing the open source software OpenFOAM. The results of two methods were compared to the results of Monte Carlo simulation with 500 runs. The order convergence of the mean value and the standard deviation (STD) were compared in terms of the quantities of interest, drag and lift coefficients. Further, the most effective model coefficient for each transitional flow could be found through the calculation of the Sobol index.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, T. H., & Chang, K. (2019). Comparison of the point-collocation non-intrusive polynomial (NIPC) and non-intrusive spectral projection (NISP) methods for the γ- r θ transition model. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9071407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free