Abstract
Pharmacophore modeling is a widely used technique in computer-aided drug discovery. Structure-based pharmacophore models of a ligand in complex with a protein have proven to be useful for supporting in silico hit discovery, hit to lead expansion, and lead optimization. As a structure-based approach it depends on the correct interpretation of ligand-protein interactions. There are legitimate concerns about the fidelity of the bound ligand and about non-physiological contacts with parts of the crystal and the solvent effects that influence the protein structure. A possible way to refine the structure of a protein-ligand system is to use the final structure of a given MD simulation. In this study we compare pharmacophore models built using the initial protein-ligand structure obtained from the protein data bank (PDB) with pharmacophore models built with the final structure of a molecular dynamics simulation. We show that the pharmacophore models differ in feature number and feature type and that the pharmacophore models built from the last structure of a MD simulation shows in some cases better ability to distinguish between active and decoy ligand structures.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wieder, M., Perricone, U., Seidel, T., Boresch, S., & Langer, T. (2016). Comparing pharmacophore models derived from crystal structures and from molecular dynamics simulations. Monatshefte Fur Chemie, 147(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-016-1674-1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.