Comparative study of four consolidation settlement estimation methods of a railway embankment

3Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Embankment is one of the oldest and most common constructions of public works due to its low cost, simplicity and good performance. This is why it is often required for economic reasons even if underlying soil is of poor quality. Meanwhile, this is not without risk, since we notice sometimes significant damages such as intolerable settlements, landslides and erosion. These risks are particularly dangerous in the case of railways where tolerances are mainly severe. In this work we propose a comparative study of four theoretical methods for estimating the consolidation settlement of a railway embankment. These methods are Terzaghi (1925), Asaoka (1978), Tan (1995) and Chunlin (2014). We applied each method to estimate the final settlement of the 15m high embankment at PK245+000 of the railway under construction Boughezoul-M'sila (Algeria).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benamghar, A., & Boudjellal, M. (2017). Comparative study of four consolidation settlement estimation methods of a railway embankment. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 120). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712006002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free