Field-Identification IAT predicts students’ academic persistence over and above Theory of Planned Behavior constructs

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ajzen and Dasgupta (2015) recently invited complementing Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) measures with measures borrowed from implicit cognition research. In this study, we examined for the first time such combination, and we did so to predict academic persistence. Specifically, 169 first-year college students answered a TPB questionnaire and completed a field-identification Implicit Association Test (IAT). The IAT measure largely predicted academic persistence 6 months later over and above TPB constructs, including behavioral intention. We discuss interpretations of this finding and its relevance to educational research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roland, N., Mierop, A., Frenay, M., & Corneille, O. (2018). Field-Identification IAT predicts students’ academic persistence over and above Theory of Planned Behavior constructs. Frontline Learning Research, 6(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v6i1.327

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free