Exploring barriers to optimal anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: Interviews with clinicians

22Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Warfarin, the most commonly used antithrombotic agent for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF), requires regular monitoring, frequent dosage adjustments, and dietary restrictions. Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to optimal AF management are an important factor in treatment. Anticoagulation management for AF is overseen by both cardiology and internal medicine (IM) practices. Thus, gaining the perspective of specialists and generalists is essential in understanding barriers to treatment. We used qualitative research methods to define key issues in the prescription of warfarin therapy for AF by cardiology specialists and IM physicians. Methods and results: Clinicians were interviewed to identify barriers to warfarin treatment in a large Midwestern city. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation occurred. Content analysis yielded several themes. The most salient theme that emerged from clinician interviews was use of characteristics other than the patient's CHADS2 score to enact a treatment plan, such as the patient's social situation and past medication-taking behavior. Other themes included patient knowledge, real-world problems, breakdown in communication, and clinician reluctance. Conclusion: Warfarin treatment is associated with many challenges. The barriers identified by clinicians highlight the unmet need associated with stroke prophylaxis in AF and the opportunity to improve anticoagulation treatment in AF. Social and lifestyle factors were important considerations in determining treatment. © 2012 Decker et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Decker, C., Garavalia, L., Garavalia, B., Simon, T., Loeb, M., Spertus, J. A., & Daniel, W. C. (2012). Exploring barriers to optimal anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: Interviews with clinicians. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 5, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S33045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free