Primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in the United States: Is it time?

23Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context.-The most recent update to cervical cancer screening guidelines offers interim guidance on the use of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening, with algorithms for management of results. After decades of screening with pure cytology and a shorter time with adjunctive HPV or cotesting with Papanicolaou (Pap) test and HPV, this is a significant change to our screening methods. Objective.-To briefly review the history of cervical cancer screening, the evidence upon which these interim guidelines were based, the arguments for and against primary HPV testing, and the current state of the field. Data Sources.-Primary studies, review articles, and commentaries were reviewed. Conclusions.-While there is evidence both for and against primary HPV testing, there are a growing number of countries adopting the practice. It would be worthwhile to be informed and prepared for such a change in the United States as well.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flanagan, M. B. (2018). Primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in the United States: Is it time? Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 142(6), 688–692. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0001-RA

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free