A Comparative, Individual Values-Based Scoring Approach to the Secure Flourish Index Among Clinical Health Professions Students

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate flourishing among medical (MD), physician assistant (PA), and nurse practitioner (NP) students, using the novel Secure Flourish Index (SFI). Method: MD, PA, and NP students from two institutions completed the traditional SFI (tSFI), then applied a percentage weight to each of the six domains (maximum total 100%) based on perceived relative importance to their overall flourishing, creating a novel self-weighted SFI score (swSFI). The Bland–Altman (BA) plot was used to assess the magnitude of agreement between scores. Results: The BA plot (n = 281) revealed a mean bias of.07(95% CI -.50,.63). Eighteen participants (6.4%) fell outside of the calculated BA limits of agreement [-9.31 [95% CI - 10.27,-8.45] and 9.45 [95% CI 8.49,10.41]]. Linear regression revealed the mean BA score is predictive of the mean difference between scores [R2 = 0.07, F(1,280) = 21.1, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neary, S., Doolittle, B., Mueller, M., & Nichols, M. (2025). A Comparative, Individual Values-Based Scoring Approach to the Secure Flourish Index Among Clinical Health Professions Students. Medical Science Educator, 35(1), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02182-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free