Dosis respuesta en la actividad analgésica periférica de la metformina en la prueba de contorsiones abdominales en ratones

  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the dose-response analgesic effect of metformin in an acute pain event in rodents. Materials and methods: Eighty (80) mice were used. The analgesic effect was evaluated using the abdominal writhing test in mice. Eight (8) groups of 10 mice each were formed: one diclofenac 8 mg/kg group, one tramadol group, one target group, and five experimental groups of metformin at doses of 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/kg. For the statistical analysis, the D'Agostino-Pearson test, one-tailed ANOVA test, Tukey's test, and Pearson's correlation coefficient were used. Results: The D'Agostino-Pearson normality test revealed a p-value < 0.05 in all groups. The ANOVA test showed a p-value < 0.0001. The Tukey's range test obtained a p-value < 0.05 between the target group and metformin groups at all doses, and between the diclofenac group and metformin groups at doses of 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/kg, and a p-value > 0.05 between the tramadol group and metformin groups at doses of 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/kg. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was r = -0.6897 and R = 0.4756, and yielded a p-value < 0.0001. Metformin showed a pain inhibition percentage in the range of 34.89 % to 92.62 %. Conclusions: It has been demonstrated that metformin at doses of 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg/kg had an acute analgesic effect in the abdominal writhing test in mice, with the 250 mg/kg dose being the one that showed the best effect. In addition, a dose-response effect was obtained in escalated doses of metformin. (English) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lujan-Carpio, E., Pante-Medina, C., & Salazar-Granara, A. (2018). Dosis respuesta en la actividad analgésica periférica de la metformina en la prueba de contorsiones abdominales en ratones. Horizonte Médico (Lima), 18(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2018.v18n2.07

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free