Digital is Not the Alternative: Dilemma and Preserving Films in India

0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Films deteriorate over time and archival methods are still being developed to prevent this. Digital technology enables the conversion of films, but there are various issues with digital approaches that present Indian archivists with the dilemma of choosing the appropriate one to film preservation. It is perceived that digital technology is inferior to film and, thus, archivists in India are struggling to preserve their film heritage for future generations. Film archivists, curators and restorers in India were interviewed as part of this study, with a thematic analysis conducted to understand the perceived insufficiency of digital preservation. Film archivists dislike digital technology but recognise its benefits, however, digital film preservation faces issues of originality, obsolescence, cost, resolution and legal aspects. Archivists suggested that digital archiving is not an alternative to film archiving but rather a complement and the study finds that the problems in digital approaches can be minimised through measures such as diligence, technological advancement, multiple copies and raising awareness which can prolong the film artefact in a digital archive. Both methods must work together to preserve the unpreservable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaishnav, A., Meena, M. K., Nandani, N., & Sharma, A. (2024). Digital is Not the Alternative: Dilemma and Preserving Films in India. Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture, 53(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2024-0020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free