Moving beyond the impasse in geographies of ‘alternative’ food networks

Abstract

Despite theoretical developments in conceptualising alterity, what counts as ‘alternative’ in unconventional systems of food provision remains contested. This paper argues that the literature has reached an impasse. I argue that overly ‘alternative’ readings conceptualise Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) as a more embedded form of economic exchange, while neoliberal readings represent them as a case of marketisation. This paper systematically reviews AFNs literature and contends that a deeper engagement with Polanyian geographies enables a more nuanced approach to evaluating alternatives and their socio-political significance. Analytically and normatively, ‘alternatives’ need not be radically ‘other’, nor seen as having been co-opted by the neoliberal order.