Occupation-Based Life Expectancy: Actuarial Fairness in Determining Statutory Retirement Age

14Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examines occupation-based differences in life expectancy and the extent to which health accounts for these differences. Twentyseven-year survival follow-up data were used from the Dutch population-based Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (n = 2,531), initial ages 55–85 years. Occupation was based on longest-held job. Results show that the non-skilled general, technical and transport domains had an up to 3.5-year shorter life expectancy than the academic professions, accounting for the compositional characteristics age and gender. Statutory retirement age could be made to vary accordingly, by allowing a proportionally greater pension build-up in the shorter-lived domains. Health accounted for a substantial portion of the longevity difference, ranging from 20 to 66%, depending on the health indicator. Thus, health differences between occupational domains today can be used as a means to tailor retirement ages to individuals’ risks of longevity. These data provide a proof of principle for the development of an actuarially fair method to determine statutory retirement ages.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deeg, D. J. H., De Tavernier, W., & de Breij, S. (2021). Occupation-Based Life Expectancy: Actuarial Fairness in Determining Statutory Retirement Age. Frontiers in Sociology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.675618

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free