Kinetic and Deactivation Differences Among Methanol, Dimethyl Ether and Chloromethane as Stock for Hydrocarbons

  • Valecillos J
  • Manzano H
  • Aguayo A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The conversions into hydrocarbons of methanol, dimethyl ether and chloromethane (MTH, DTH and CTH, respectively) on a H‐ZSM‐5 zeolite catalyst were compared trough ab‐initio calculations and experiments, using a fixed‐bed reactor and in‐situ FTIR spectroscopy. The molecular modelling of the reaction was performed using force field calculations. The nature and location of retained species were assessed by a combination of techniques. The experimental results of activity, product distribution and deactivation match these of the molecular modelling as the three reactions proceed through the dual‐cycle mechanism. However, the initiation, evolution and degradation of hydrocarbon pool species are kinetically different depending on the reactant. The reactions are faster in the order DTH>MTH≫CTH whereas the rate at which coke forms and grows (linked with the rate of deactivation) is in the order CTH≫DTH>MTH.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Valecillos, J., Manzano, H., Aguayo, A. T., Bilbao, J., & Castaño, P. (2019). Kinetic and Deactivation Differences Among Methanol, Dimethyl Ether and Chloromethane as Stock for Hydrocarbons. ChemCatChem, 11(22), 5444–5456. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201901204

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free