Modelling low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering channel power structures and cross-shareholding

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Under the background of low-carbon economy, cross-shareholding is introduced into the low-carbon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) composed of a manufacturer and a retailer, a centralized and three decentralized decision-making models with different channel power structures are constructed. The recovery, emission reduction, and pricing decisions of low-carbon CLSC are studied, and a two-part-tariff contract is proposed to coordinate the low-carbon CLSC. The results indicate that under three channel power structures, the improvement of the cross-shareholding ratio and consumers'low-carbon awareness are beneficial to improve recovery rate, carbon emission reduction and increase market demand. Under Nash Game, the profit of low-carbon CLSC can reach the centralized level which means cross-shareholding can realize the coordination of low-carbon CLSC. Under Stackelberg Game, the enterprise with larger channel power can always obtain higher profit. Cross-shareholding cannot coordinate the retailer-led low-carbon CLSC, however it can realize the partial coordination of the manufacturer-led low-carbon CLSC. Two-part-tariff contract can realize the coordination of low-carbon CLSC under both situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, J., Yang, L., Shao, T., & Yao, F. (2023). Modelling low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering channel power structures and cross-shareholding. RAIRO - Operations Research, 57(2), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2023002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free