Objective. To determine the best test(s) for predicting functional recovery of hibernating myocardium after reperfusion. Methods. A prospective study to compare echocardiographic left ventricular diastolic wall thickness (≥ 5 mm), low-dose dobutamine echocardiography and rest-redistribution thallium-201 scintigraphy, alone and in combination, for predicting recovery of left ventricular akinesis after surgical revascularization. Results. Twenty-eight consecutive patients aged 58 ± 9 years were studied. Of the 448 left ventricular segments, 263 were akinetic at rest; 230/263 (87%) had wall thickness 25 mm, 135 (51%) had a positive response and 175 (66.5%) were graded viable on thallium. Of akinetic segments 61% improved after surgery. Left ventricular score decreased from 2.3 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.4 (P < 0.01) and ejection fraction increased from 27 ± 10 to 37 ± 14% (P < 0.01). For predicting results at 1 year, diastolic wall thickness had a sensitivity and a predictive accuracy of a negative test of 100% but a specificity of 28% and predictive accuracy of a positive test of 61%. The addition of dobutamine echocardiography or thallium-201 improved the predictive accuracy of a positive test to 76% and 69%, respectively; the addition of both tests was not of greater benefit than that of a single test. Conclusions. Diastolic wall thickness < 5 mm on echocardiography was the best simple and single predictor of non-recovery of left ventricular dysfunction. The addition of dobutamine echocardiography or thallium-201, but not both, was the best solution for predicting recovery of left ventricular dysfunction. In times of limited resources, these findings are important from a clinical point of view. (C) 2000 The European Society of Cardiology.
CITATION STYLE
Lacanna, G., Rahimtoola, S. H., Visioli, O., Giubbini, R., Alfieri, O., Zognio, M., … Ferrari, R. (2000). Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of non-invasive tests, singly and in combination, for diagnosis of hibernating myocardium. European Heart Journal, 21(16), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1999.2038
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.