Quando o animal dura mais que a estimação

1Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study of human-animal relations has been conspicuous in contemporary anthropology. It has developed along two complementary fields, one political and the other epistemological. The first involves activism and new social movements concerning the rights and moralities of animals, while the other questions and reframes the distinctions between animals and humans. In this article, I address these issues by investigating a moral dilemma involving an old, sick dog that, after spending its life as part of a human family, had to be euthanized and ultimately became blood stock for a veterinary clinic. Physicality and morality are mobilized contingently in this research context, both to identify and differentiate humans and animals and to compose and decompose a pet.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Segata, J. (2016). Quando o animal dura mais que a estimação. Mana: Estudos de Antropologia Social, 22(3), 831–856. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-49442016v22n3p831

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free