The metabolic syndrome and cognitive performance: The Northern Manhattan Study

43Citations
Citations of this article
70Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a risk factor for diabetes, stroke, myocardial infarction, and increased mortality, and has been associated with cognition in some populations. We hypothesized that MetS would be associated with lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in a multi-ethnic population, and that MetS is a better predictor of cognition than its individual components or diabetes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis among 3,150 stroke-free participants. MetS was defined by the modified National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines-Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII) criteria. Linear regression and polytomous logistic regression estimated the association between MMSE score and MetS, its individual components, diabetes, and inflammatory biomarkers. Results: MetS was inversely associated with MMSE score (unadjusted β = -0.67; 95% CI -0.92, -0.41). Adjusting for potential confounders, MetS was associated with lower MMSE score (adjusted β = -0.24; 95% CI -0.47, -0.01), but its individual components and diabetes were not. Those with MetS were more likely to have an MMSE score of <18 than a score of ≥24 (adjusted OR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.26, 3.01). There was an interaction between MetS and race-ethnicity, such that MetS was associated with lower MMSE score among non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics but not non-Hispanic blacks. Conclusions: MetS was associated with lower cognition in a multi-ethnic population. Further studies of the effect of MetS on cognition are warranted, and should account for demographic differences. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vieira, J. R., Elkind, M. S. V., Moon, Y. P., Rundek, T., Boden-Albala, B., Paik, M. C., … Wright, C. B. (2011). The metabolic syndrome and cognitive performance: The Northern Manhattan Study. Neuroepidemiology, 37(3–4), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000332208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free