Abstract
Background: Disparities in sex and race/ethnicity continue to persist in the academic radiology. This study addresses the sex/racial underrepresentation and evolution in the academic radiology. Purpose: To evaluate academic radiology temporal trends disparities by analyzing sex and race/ethnicity diversity in academic degree and tenure status. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis conducted using American Association of Medical College database between 2007 and 2018. Trends in academic degree, tenure status, race/ethnicity, and sex assessed with linear regression analysis and Poisson regression model for annual percent change with statistical significance of p < 0.05. Results: Out of 107,213 radiologists 72%, n = 76,893 males and 64%, n = 68,738 white faculty with 1277 males and 872 females. White MD-degree radiologists constitute 67.2%, Asian (20.9%), Black (2.5%), Hispanic (3.2%), multiple (3.4%), unknown (1.8%) and “other” (1%) races with a similar PhD/other doctoral and dual-degree. White faculty recruitment trend (n2007 = 955, n2018 = 703) and representation (−0.82% per year; 95% CI, −1.00 to −0.63; p < 0.0001) decreased, while Asian URM decreased respectively (n2007 = 152, n2018 = 205) (0.68% per year; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.77; p < 0.0001). Females were underrepresented in all categories. Conclusion: URM and females are underrepresented in academic radiology. Academic degree types and tenure track may contribute to White and male academic radiologists overrepresentation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Qamar, S. R., Dhawan, T., Adham, S., Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi, N., Rehman, I., Robbins, J. B., … Khosa, F. (2023). Equity, diversity & inclusion in academic radiology: An elusive dream. Clinical Imaging, 95, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2022.11.018
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.