A meta-analysis of the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: A detection method with high efficiency and accuracy is urgently needed in clinical work. The purpose of our study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for intestinal tuberculosis (ITB). Methods: We searched PubMed and 4 other databases from their establishment to July 19, 2022, for published essays of diagnostic performance in which Xpert MTB/RIF was used to test patients with clinically suspected ITB. An assessment of the quality of the selected literature was conducted using QUADAS-2. We built forest plots by MetaDiSc software. Results: The pooled Xpert MTB/RIF sensitivity was 48%, and the specificity was 99%. Moreover, the positive likelihood ratio for ITB diagnosis was 21.61. The negative likelihood ratio was 0.54. There were substantial variations between the study estimates of sensitivity (I2 = 87.6%) and specificity (I2 = 82.4%). Conclusion: Intestinal TB is detected with limited diagnostic sensitivity by Xpert MTB/RIF but with high specificity. An Xpert-positive result may facilitate the rapid identification of ITB cases. Nevertheless, a negative result has less certainty in excluding the disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, Y. L., Yan, R. C., Chen, H. K., & Guo, X. G. (2024). A meta-analysis of the accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis. Lab Medicine, 55(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmad072

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free