Awareness of, and Compliance with, Domperidone Revised Labeling After a Risk-Minimization Activity in Europe

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Risk-minimization measures (RMM), including label revisions were implemented in Europe for domperidone because of evidence of increased incidence of cardiac arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death. In accordance with the guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices, the European Medicines Agency Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee requested to conduct two studies to evaluate the effectiveness of these risk minimization measures. Methods: In Belgium, France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, surveys were conducted to assess physicians’ knowledge on the updated domperidone labeling information, and a drug-utilization study (DUS) was conducted using healthcare databases to assess domperidone prescribing patterns before and after the RMM. Four DUS sensitivity analyses (scenarios) evaluated uncertainty regarding domperidone treatment duration and indication. Results: Among 1805 physicians participating in the survey, most were aware of the approved indication (nausea and vomiting, 80%), treatment duration (≤ 7 days, 70%), and maximum adult daily dose (10 mg three times daily, 84%). Only 33% selected the on-label indication from a list of indications for which they would prescribe domperidone. Awareness was low for medications contraindicated for concomitant use (26%) and contraindicated conditions (4%). In the DUS, under the optimistic scenario, a large improvement in labeling compliance from pre- to post-implementation period was observed in France (27% vs. 69%), while Belgium, Germany, Spain, and the UK showed small improvements (< 10%). In the other scenarios, there was little to no improvement in compliance with the revised labeling from the pre- to post-implementation periods in most countries. Conclusions: The survey findings documented that most physicians in all five countries were aware of the main aspects of the revised labeling. Results of the DUS were inconclusive regarding the effect of the RMM and compliance with the revised labeling for all countries except France.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fife, D., Waller, J., Kaplan, S., Hu, P., Phillips, S., Oliveria, S. A., & Richarz, U. (2019). Awareness of, and Compliance with, Domperidone Revised Labeling After a Risk-Minimization Activity in Europe. Clinical Drug Investigation, 39(11), 1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00831-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free