Estrogen receptor expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel in breast cancer

17Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A retrospective analysis of CALGB trial 9344 suggested paclitaxel administration following cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin adjuvant chemotherapy is most beneficial for patients with ERα negative (ERα-) breast cancer. Since the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel are cell cycle dependent, we postulated that the relationship between ERα and the effectiveness of adjuvant paclitaxel reflects the observation that ERα positive (ERα+) breast cancers proliferate more slowly than ERα- breast cancers. Three in vitro models (MCF-7, T47D and ZR-75) were examined to compare growth rates and paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in ERα+ and ERα- clones of the same, originally ERα+ cell line. For the T47D and ZR-75 cell lines, loss of ERα was associated with a decrease in doubling time and an increase in paclitaxel sensitivity. However, when cell culture conditions were altered to achieve equivalent cell proliferation rates, no difference in paclitaxel sensitivity was observed. Similarly, an ERα- clone of MCF-7 cells that did not exhibit an enhanced growth rate compared to its ERα+ counterpart also did not show increased paclitaxel sensitivity. The combined apoptotic effects of tamoxifen and paclitaxel on MCF-7 cells were not synergistic or even clearly additive. In these in vitro models, the effectiveness of paclitaxel correlated more closely with growth rate than ERα expression. These data suggest that measurements of tumor proliferation may provide more accurate predictive markers for the benefits of adjuvant paclitaxel than ERα analysis. ©2004 Landes Bioscience.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dougherty, M. K., Schumaker, L. M., Jordan, V. C., Welshons, W. V., Curran, E. M., Ellis, M. J., & El-Ashry, D. (2004). Estrogen receptor expression and sensitivity to paclitaxel in breast cancer. Cancer Biology and Therapy, 3(5), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.3.5.810

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free