Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with or without flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma a case series

50Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma (PPL) has not been previously described. Our aims were to describe the EUS features of PPL and the role of EUS-FNA with and without flow cytometry in the diagnosis of 16 patients. When EUS-FNA with flow cytometry was compared with EUS-FNA without flow cytometry, the sensitivities for diagnosing non-Hodgkins lymphoma were 84.6% versus 30.8%, respectively (P=0.01). EUS-FNA with flow cytometry is a valuable tool to diagnose PPL. Flow cytometry analysis complements traditional assessment by standard cytology. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khashab, M., Mokadem, M., Dewitt, J., Emerson, R., Sherman, S., Leblanc, J., … Al-Haddad, M. (2010). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with or without flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma a case series. Endoscopy, 42(3), 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1243859

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free