Abstract
Objective: The goal of the study was to examine the strain in the sutures of the midface and the cranial base with maxillary protraction therapy and to clarify whether such stretching suggests a skeletal effect of the apparatus employed for that purpose. Materials and Methods: Using a finite elements model, a maxillary protraction therapy was simulated with various force levels and vectors, and the strains appearing at the sutures (in μstrain) were measured at the midface and the cranial base. The simulation model we employed consisted of 53,555 individual elements; the simulated forces were 2 X 3 N and 2 X 5 N, while the vectors of the applied forces were in the anterior and anterior caudal direction. Results: The maximum measured strains were on average below 10 μstrain, while higher values were measured only at the nasal bone and at the cranial base at the oval and spinous foramina with anterior directed force vectors (26.4 μstrain). With an anterior-caudal force vector, the measured values were usually lower. Discussion: The measured strains were on average about hundredfold lower than the Frost thresholds (2000 7mu;strain). It does not seem probable that the strains occurring upon maxillary protraction therapy suffice to stimulate any additional bone growth. Conclusion: The good clinical efficacy of maxillary protraction therapy is apparently based, for the most part, on dental effects, while its skeletal effects still remain doubtful. © 2007 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Holberg, C., Mahaini, L., & Rudzki, I. (2007). Analysis of sutural strain in maxillary protraction therapy. Angle Orthodontist, 77(4), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.2319/090505-312
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.