Primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus: Results from the primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis-2 trial

89Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence for a clinical benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with fibrinolysis; however, whether the treatment effect is consistent among patients with diabetes mellitus is unclear. We compared PCI with fibrinolysis for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Methods: A pooled analysis of individual patient data from 19 trials comparing primary PCI with fibrinolysis for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was performed. Trials that enrolled at least 50 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and randomized patients to receive either primary PCI or fibrinolysis were considered for inclusion in our study. Clinical end points were total deaths, recurrent infarction, death or nonfatal recurrent infarction, and stroke, measured 30 days after randomization. Results: Of 6315 patients, 877 (14%) had diabetes. Thirty-day mortality (9.4% vs 5.9%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Timmer, J. R., Ottervanger, J. P., De Boer, M. J., Boersma, E., Grines, C. L., Westerhout, C. M., … Zijlstra, F. (2007). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction in diabetes mellitus: Results from the primary coronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis-2 trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(13), 1353–1359. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.13.1353

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free