Why representativeness should be avoided

723Citations
Citations of this article
633Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The essence of knowledge is generalisation. That rubbing wood in a certain way can produce fire is a knowledge derived by generalisation from individual experiences; the statement means that rubbing wood in this way will always produce fire. The art of discovery is therefore the art of correct generalisation. What is irrelevant, such as the particular shape or size of the piece of wood used, is to be excluded from the generalisation; what is relevant, for example, the dryness of the wood, is to be included in it. The meaning of the term relevant can thus be defined: that is relevant which must be mentioned for the generalisation to be valid. The separation of relevant from irrelevant factors is the beginning of knowledge. © The Author 2013; All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rothman, K. J., Gallacher, J. E. J., & Hatch, E. E. (2013). Why representativeness should be avoided. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42(4), 1012–1014. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free